Technology’s Latest Victim, the Writer

February 17, 2012
By ichabod

Mark Twain

The sage, story teller, poets, historians and journalists among others may be the newest victim of technology.  I just read an article where technology is used to write stories.  Not only does the software exist, it is being used.

The science fiction of a few decades ago is rapidly closing in on us.  We wonder why there are no good paying middle class jobs in existence.  Who needs paper pushers when someone can write software to do the job, mechanical limbs to execute tasks and fail safe systems to prevent error and downtime?

I can see it now.  A robot inspired and written headline, The Human Being is Now Obsolete.

Wait till the legal profession, judges and accountants are replaced by machines.  The capability is there now.  Then there are politicians and civil servants who could be replaced.  What about preachers?

Just think, with machines without souls, there are no temptations.  No more scandals or other deviations.

Are we going too far?

Methinks yes.

4 Responses to Technology’s Latest Victim, the Writer

  1. jonolan on February 17, 2012 at 6:07 pm

    We really don’t have a choice given we’re in a global economy, competing against what amounts to slave labor. The combination of US workers’ salary demands and “required” working conditions means we have to eliminate as many of them as possible in order to stay even marginally competitive.

    • ichabod on February 17, 2012 at 8:13 pm

      Hi jonolan;

      I vicious downward spiral, as our economy is largely a consumer driven one, and who will be able to afford to buy when they are existing on food stamps and government largesse, when the government’s revenues aren’t close to what they spend.

      I have always maintained that one of the biggest if not the biggest problems coming to the surface confronting mankind and the last 30 years are proving it.

      It is not that technology in and of itself is bad, a human being with nothing to do and with no money can be a destructive force if there are enough of them.

      • jonolan on February 18, 2012 at 7:57 am

        In a way I agree with you that we’re now paying for a couple of generations of foolishness. I just think that foolishness was the “keeping up with Joneses” hyper-consumerism that drove a bloated economy based upon fictions.

        The dream is over because the wake up call has rung. Like you though, I think a lot people are going to wake up on the wrong side of bed.

  2. bouzouki
    bouzouki on February 18, 2012 at 11:13 am

    I would respond to the comments because this topic has held my interest for years, but I have been spellbound by the things people do with technology. The writer might become obsolete, but the imagination stretches far beyond the machine, even when humans do things with machines, I don’t think the machines can be as innovative and creative. John Cage and others began pushing the rules of music. John Cage used the Chinese I Ching as a basis for shifting to different motifs in some of his works. Phillip K. Dick used the I Ching as he wrote “The Man in the High Castle” which I want to reread. John Oswald has taken bits of recorded material and using a machine, altered the content into something different.

    I get a sense that to go beyond our strait-jacket constraints that we have so easily worn, we have to push the barriers that we have established by becoming simple consumers, and that will require some serious artistry. We need to change our Myths, and think about the world differently. The speculative fiction of my younger days defined our world by using different planets, aliens, and strange notions. The Tree of Life, a movie, takes the narrative in a new direction, adding images and cosmologies to the story. I have a two CD version of a Grateful Dead song, “Dark Star” which uses thirty years of live material, creating something new. I have a John Cage CD that is a series of anecdotes, each a certain length of time, while, in an other room, David Tudor is playing a piano piece, with lengthy rests, and neither listens to the other while it happens. These ideas of art are ways to counteract the stupidity of thinking that our machines are more creative than we are, although most people are content to live with popular music, watch predictable stories on our media, believe things because we are told, and fear what quantum physics tells us about the world smaller than a pin point.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

This site is protected by WP-CopyRightPro